Closed seb-le closed 2 years ago
Can you show your reproduced results? my torch version is 1.1.0. I think the reason why your evaluation of the trained model is different from the paper is that the printing format.
As your mentioned, I tried to evaluate the official model of this repo on torch 1.1.0. But, I still faced different results from the paper.
Below is the results by evaluation code of this repo:
More precisely: 0.10242 0.76323 4.48215 0.17993 0.89543 0.96449 0.98312
Thank you.
Sorry for replying to you late. I have retrained and evaluated a model and what I got is
The model named diffnet_640x192 is available on google drive.
Thank you for your kindness!
I downloaded and evaluated it.
Although there are some differences between your test and my test, it is very minor.
Again, I appreciate your kindness,
and I have really learned a lot thanks to your source code and your paper.
Thanks.
Hi, thank you for sharing your nice work.
Could you share the environment setting such as versions of packages for this work?
I cannot reproduce the results of this paper even if using the pretrained model that is provided in this repo.
In my evaluation: 0.1024 0.7632 4.482 1.799 0.8954 0.9645 0.9831
In the paper: 0.102 0.764 4.483 0.180 0.896 0.965 0.983