Closed brandonbloom closed 9 years ago
This is waiting behind #6 and me to find some more time for this project. Thanks again for taking on this work.
Hey @michalmarczyk, I'm sorry that I haven't merged this yet. I really do want to get CLJS support, but I don't particularly feel like maintaining two versions of all the code files. I'm willing to entertain cljx, but I'd need to play with it a bit to make sure it won't drive me insane (I've been unsuccessful with it in the past). The good news is that I've been doing a lot more CLJS work professionally lately, so my endured CLJS non-pretty-printing pain is rising and I'd really like to get this done.
I'm still undecided between cljsx and something else, but one things for sure: I don't want to maintain two copies of the code in a single repository. Going to close this particular PR (sorry!) and track work over with issue #7.
Cool! Thanks for doing this. I'll take a look at it in much more detail early this week. I will likely take this as a branch and publish a SNAPSHOT version until I'm sure we want @michalmarczyk's rrb branch on master (which we probably do).