search

brazilofmux / tinymux

TinyMUX
www.tinymux.org
48 stars 21 forks source link

Question: @comon #408

Closed brazilofmux closed 9 years ago

brazilofmux commented 9 years ago

Original issue 405 created by brazilofmux on 2007-10-26T01:05:28.000Z:

Shouldn't @comon be triggered when someone uses "addcom" to join a channel? 2.7.0.11 does not trigger the message, so folks miss out on any messagery placed in the attribute on their initial entry to the channel.

brazilofmux commented 9 years ago

Comment #1 originally posted by brazilofmux on 2007-10-28T01:05:25.000Z:

<empty>

brazilofmux commented 9 years ago

Comment #2 originally posted by brazilofmux on 2007-11-03T18:20:39.000Z:

There's @comjoin, @comon, @comff, and @comleave. The choice of when each fires is somewhat arbitrary.

The @comjoin message is sent when a player addcoms a channel. It sounds like you want both @comjoin and the @comon message to be sent when addcom occurs. However, delcom only sends the @comleave message, so to be consistent, you would also want both the @comoff and @comleave message to be sent.

Either way is about the same, but I'd prefer a single message for a single cause. Addcom -> @comjoin, alias on --> @comon, alias off ->@comoff, delcom @comleave. While this may make some of your message more redundant, it also allows your messages be crafts more narrowly to the situation in a way that sending two messages cannot.

brazilofmux commented 9 years ago

Comment #3 originally posted by brazilofmux on 2007-11-04T00:51:07.000Z:

Aha! I didn't realize there -was- a @comjoin and @comleave. Thought @comon and @comoff were the only new additions in 2.7. My bad!