There are cases where this is not possible, such as suit-sha256-hsslms-ecdh-a128ctr.
In this case, the closest equivalent profile SHOULD be used, for
example suit-sha256-ecdsa-ecdh-a128ctr.
However, neither suit-sha256-hsslms-ecdh-a128ctr nor suit-sha256-ecdsa-ecdh-a128ctr are defined in -02.
There is suit-sha256-hsslms-a256kw-a256ctr and suit-sha256-es256-ecdh-a128ctr however. Perhaps those are what section 4 meant to use?
There seems to be a contradiction in -02.
Section 4 has:
However, neither suit-sha256-hsslms-ecdh-a128ctr nor suit-sha256-ecdsa-ecdh-a128ctr are defined in -02.
There is suit-sha256-hsslms-a256kw-a256ctr and suit-sha256-es256-ecdh-a128ctr however. Perhaps those are what section 4 meant to use?