I think some users may perceive a release candidate to be more stable than the latest commit from main at some arbitrary point in time. Which is considered more stable? I see a couple of users saying that they have tested a recent Amazonka in production, but I am not sure whether that is the release candidate or the latest main.
Would be nice to have this documented, such that people are not missing out on potential important bugfixes that have occurred since 2.0.0-rc1. Or the reverse, if experimental changes have occurred, and it is better to stay on 2.0.0-rc1.
Best to follow main. I try very hard not to push experimental things there, and work uses it as well so at least the core libraries and the services we use are reasonably well-tested.
I think some users may perceive a release candidate to be more stable than the latest commit from
main
at some arbitrary point in time. Which is considered more stable? I see a couple of users saying that they have tested a recent Amazonka in production, but I am not sure whether that is the release candidate or the latestmain
.Would be nice to have this documented, such that people are not missing out on potential important bugfixes that have occurred since 2.0.0-rc1. Or the reverse, if experimental changes have occurred, and it is better to stay on 2.0.0-rc1.