Open brendanneojw opened 1 year ago
The team sees no ambiguity in the understanding of the above statement.
It is mentioned clearly what the command accepts through the example: it takes STUDENT_NAME
or STUDENT_ID
as the first argument. The logical interpretation for this would be that only one of STUDENT_NAME
or STUDENT_ID
should be chosen, as it does not make sense for STUDENT_NAME
or STUDENT_ID
to both be the first argument.
As such, it is quite clear that the user should not be keying in both STUDENT_NAME
and STUDENT_ID
, when |
is used.
Hence, there is no presence of ambiguity to the aforementioned.
Team chose [response.Rejected
]
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Under the
Features
section in the information box for Notes about the command format in the UG, point number 3 states the followItems with | indicate that the command accepts either parameters. e.g mark n/STUDENT_NAME | id/STUDENT_ID takes in STUDENT_NAME or STUDENT_ID as its first argument.
This is unclear as to whether the user will be allowed to key in both and the command still takes in the first argument.