Closed zhixue closed 1 year ago
Thank you for your awesome tool for calling and genotyping SVs! It is really smooth and user-friendly!
I had problems about the insertion records in results. I tested two real data sets to call SVs with commands:
sample=SampleA # or sampleB # bwa map echo "# BWA map" bwa mem -t 8 -M ~/ref/Chr.fa ${sample}_1.fq.gz ${sample}_2.fq.gz > ${sample}.sam 2> ./${sample}.mem-pe.log # samtools sort index samtools sort -o ${sample}.bam ${sample}.sam samtools index ${sample}.bam rm -rf ${sample}.sam # smoove 0.2.8, call SVs singularity exec ~/tools/smoove_latest.sif smoove call --outdir ${sample}_smoove --name $sample --fasta ~/ref/Chr.fa -p 1 --genotype ${sample}.bam # count ins records cat ${sample}_smoove/${sample}-smoove.genotyped.vcf.gz| grep 'SVTYPE=INS'|wc -l # 0 # check ins in annotation lines cat ${sample}_smoove/${sample}-smoove.genotyped.vcf.gz| grep 'INS' # ##ALT=<ID=INS,Description="Insertion of novel sequence">
but I got no INS records in both of two data sets.
Files could be downloaded here: SampleA-smoove.genotyped.vcf.gz and SampleB-smoove.genotyped.vcf.gz.
I noticed that ''excluding variants with all unknown or homozygous reference genotypes'' existed in log. So INS is defined as unknown? Is it correct?
Hi, Smoove uses lumpy and svtyper which do not handle insertions. So we don't expect any in the output.
Thank you for your awesome tool for calling and genotyping SVs! It is really smooth and user-friendly!
I had problems about the insertion records in results. I tested two real data sets to call SVs with commands:
but I got no INS records in both of two data sets.
Files could be downloaded here: SampleA-smoove.genotyped.vcf.gz and SampleB-smoove.genotyped.vcf.gz.
I noticed that ''excluding variants with all unknown or homozygous reference genotypes'' existed in log. So INS is defined as unknown? Is it correct?