Open brettlangdon opened 8 years ago
Is there a reason Datadog doesn't return string representation of these numbers? Seems like an odd choice...
Hard to know for sure, my best guess is for backwards compatibility, since they have always been numbers, and are stored as numbers on their end. The numbers are actually fine, if you can parse an int64.
We could probably coerce the ids into strings here in this library, but we'd probably still have to use json-bigint
for parsing first anyways.
¯(ツ)/¯
I could have sworn I had written something in the readme about it, but apparently I didn't.
For reference for anyone finding this before I actually get around to adding it to the docs:
We ran into an issue #16 which is that number values returned from Datadog were larger than JSON could support, so there was lose of precision/overflowing for large numbers.
The solution was to utilize json-bigint which utilizes bignumber.js to support larger numbers in JSON.
The problem with this is that the format that
bignumber.js
stores numbers in isn't the most intuitive manner.For information on how to interact with
bignumber.js
please see their documentation: https://www.npmjs.com/package/bignumber.js