Closed andralex closed 1 day ago
I should also mention the necessity of hashing and perhaps comparing for inequality. People will be liable to define and use hashtables that map e.g. one type to another:
std::unordered_map<std::meta::info, std::meta::info> replacement_table;
Probably could use the constexpr type comparison paper for the hashing bit...
On Tue, May 14, 2024, 18:39 Andrei Alexandrescu @.***> wrote:
I should also mention the necessity of hashing and perhaps comparing for inequality. People will be liable to define and use hashtables that map e.g. one type to another:
std::unordered_map<std::meta::info, std::meta::info> replacement_table;
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/brevzin/cpp_proposals/pull/166#issuecomment-2110781190, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAA5R5JRQTH3PWBOOV6L25DZCJD57AVCNFSM6AAAAABHWMZEDCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCMJQG44DCMJZGA . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
I think we decided not to do this one.
Title