Closed stekycz closed 5 years ago
TS type definitions were added recently in version 2.2.0.
However, there is already an existing Definitely Typed version of them.
They are different and definitely typed version is better to use for us. ISo I would suggest merge of them together.
Differences (issues in new type definitions):
TypeParser
oid: TypeId
arrayParser
All sounds valid, would really appreciate a PR!
@bendrucker Created. I have tried to prepare the best definition of types possible that matches the implementation fully.
TS type definitions were added recently in version 2.2.0.
However, there is already an existing Definitely Typed version of them.
They are different and definitely typed version is better to use for us. ISo I would suggest merge of them together.
Differences (issues in new type definitions):
TypeParser
type for parsing functionoid: TypeId
which does not allow custom DB types which might have any numberarrayParser
type definition that does not respect the implementation (Definitely Typed definition does)