Closed parker-codes closed 5 years ago
Hello,
I have to consider it wisely, we yet have a lot of automated features in our doc we do not want to lose for load time or design improvement.
I have to update the documentation very often and I do not wish to take more time in it without a consequent benefit for the doc.
For exemple following features we have must be kept:
Note that our doc is already compiled into static files (and hosted on a static hosting). And can be edited by anyone using those instructions https://carbon.nesbot.com/contribute/
I already used Gatsby and I'm not sure to understand why it would be somehow different in caching or installability because it's a PWA.
But I'm very interested in learning more about it and see how it can help Carbon.
Thanks for your quick reply. I think that some of those are already baked into something like Gatsby, though it is nice to see that your workflow is so tightly integrated. This is more than I had initially thought.
This all came about because my initial load times for the docs was very slow. I see that consecutive requests are sped up from the caching.
I was only hoping to fulfill a need, but since you already have much of this in place, you can disregard. :)
A note on how a PWA could help - many other docs sites I use are PWAs which let me have them installed on my phone and works offline.
I do not want to throw the baby with the bath water. I would gladly evolve to shiny new stuff if I'm sure existing features could still be available with equivalent ease of maintenance.
I completely understand.
Hello,
I am a regular user of Carbon through Laravel. I wanted to offer to redo the docs site through Gatsby if you're interested. It works very well for docs for a number of reasons:
On top of that, I have some ideas for aesthetics that you may like.
Let me know what you think!
Parker McMullin