Trying to compile a project that depends on ring with Cranelift fails. I didn't see any issue filed about it so I thought there should be a place to track progress.
While they plan on implementing a bunch of std::arch SIMD intrinsics, maybe the correct solution is to check for cranelift and not use them?
Versions:
ring 0.17.8
cranelift_codegen 0.110.1
rustc_codegen_cranelift 0.1.0
rustc 1.82.0-nightly (b5d44db1d 2024-07-26)
error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed
--> /Users/nsabovic/.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/ring-0.17.8/src/cpu/arm.rs:352:54
|
352 | const _AARCH64_APPLE_TARGETS_EXPECTED_FEATURES: () = assert!(
| ______________________________________________________^
353 | | ((ARMCAP_STATIC & _AARCH64_APPLE_FEATURES) == _AARCH64_APPLE_FEATURES)
354 | | || !cfg!(all(target_arch = "aarch64", target_vendor = "apple"))
355 | | );
| |_^ the evaluated program panicked at 'assertion failed: ((ARMCAP_STATIC & _AARCH64_APPLE_FEATURES) == _AARCH64_APPLE_FEATURES) ||
!cfg!(all(target_arch = "aarch64", target_vendor = "apple"))', /Users/nsabovic/.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/ring-0.17.8/src/cpu/arm.rs:352:54
|
= note: this error originates in the macro `assert` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
Trying to compile a project that depends on ring with Cranelift fails. I didn't see any issue filed about it so I thought there should be a place to track progress.
While they plan on implementing a bunch of std::arch SIMD intrinsics, maybe the correct solution is to check for cranelift and not use them?
Versions: