Closed briansmith closed 3 years ago
@djc PTAL at this and let me know if there are any other renamings I should do.
Merging #210 (b5fe1a8) into main (5fd730e) will decrease coverage by
20.96%
. The diff coverage is61.90%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #210 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 71.48% 50.52% -20.97%
===========================================
Files 17 17
Lines 1403 1987 +584
===========================================
+ Hits 1003 1004 +1
- Misses 400 983 +583
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/calendar.rs | 89.01% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
src/error.rs | 21.66% <ø> (-50.56%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/lib.rs | 1.49% <0.00%> (-13.60%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/name/ip_address.rs | 0.00% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
src/name/verify.rs | 4.06% <0.00%> (-0.05%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/end_entity.rs | 31.08% <66.66%> (-68.92%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/der.rs | 90.17% <68.75%> (ø) |
|
src/name/dns_name.rs | 61.39% <71.42%> (ø) |
|
src/verify_cert.rs | 89.17% <76.19%> (ø) |
|
src/cert.rs | 95.79% <87.50%> (ø) |
|
... and 8 more |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5fd730e...b5fe1a8. Read the comment docs.
I looked over the rustdoc from 0.22.0. Here are things that stood out:
TlsServerTrustAnchors
in EndEntityCert::verify_is_valid_tls_*_cert()
, though method argument names don't actually get written down in code.Names
name for the generic argument in EndEntityCert::verify_is_valid_for_at_least_one_dns_name()
also had me confused for a moment since it doesn't use the usual convention of using one letter names. In this case, maybe just write the argument type as an impl Iterator
directly?spki
field name in TrustAnchor
stands out a little because the other fields are fully written out. I think it would be more idiomatic here to write out subject_public_key_info
even though it's a mouthful.Error::PathLenConstraintViolated
, I'd probably write out Length
instead of Len
.Error::RequiredEkuNotFound
, Eku
stands out as an uncommon acronym. I might write it out as RequiredKeyUsageNotFound
.None of these are especially aggravating, though, so this is a nice improvement.
- Weird argument name
TlsServerTrustAnchors
inEndEntityCert::verify_is_valid_tls_*_cert()
, though method argument names don't actually get written down in code.
If I correctly understand what you're referencing, that isn't the argument name; it's a pattern: &TlsClientTrustAnchors(trust_anchors): &TlsClientTrustAnchors
.
- The
Names
name for the generic argument inEndEntityCert::verify_is_valid_for_at_least_one_dns_name()
also had me confused for a moment since it doesn't use the usual convention of using one letter names. In this case, maybe just write the argument type as animpl Iterator
directly?
Sure, I'll switch it to impl Iterator
. FWIW, I don't believe the one-letter names are a good convention, which is why I often use longer names (for lifetimes as well).
- The
spki
field name inTrustAnchor
stands out a little because the other fields are fully written out. I think it would be more idiomatic here to write outsubject_public_key_info
even though it's a mouthful.
I'll consider this when/if we have some other reason to change it. SPKI is a well-known acronym in the X.509 space, although it's fair to note that many users will have no familiarity with X.509.
- In
Error::PathLenConstraintViolated
, I'd probably write outLength
instead ofLen
.
pathLenConstraint
, spelled exactly like that, is a term from the X.509 spec.
- In
Error::RequiredEkuNotFound
,Eku
stands out as an uncommon acronym. I might write it out asRequiredKeyUsageNotFound
.
keyUsage
is a different field of the certificate that has a different meaning. EKU is a very common abbreviation for people dealing with certificates.
None of these are especially aggravating, though, so this is a nice improvement.
Thanks for looking through this. I was focused on the names that affect the API but your feedback on the other names has been useful too.
See the individual commit messages for details.