search

briatte / awesome-network-analysis

A curated list of awesome network analysis resources.
http://f.briatte.org/r/awesome-network-analysis-list
3.54k stars 606 forks source link

Add more awesome two-mode / hypernetwork stuff #14

Closed briatte closed 8 years ago

briatte commented 8 years ago
taniki commented 8 years ago
briatte commented 8 years ago

Are two-mode subsection equivalent to bi-partite networks?

Two-mode = Bipartite, yes. Don't know about "subsection" in the context of graphs.

Are hypernetworks also equivalent to multiplex networks?

As far as I understand, yes, but I know very little about them. Hypernetworks are also called k-partite in some contexts, as far as I understand.

taniki commented 8 years ago

Last time I mentioned a multiplex network, somone send me this reference http://www.springer.com/us/book/9783319067926 did not got time to dig into it until then.

Schreiber, Falk, Andreas Kerren, Katy Börner, Hans Hagen, and Dirk Zeckzer. 2014. "Heterogeneous Networks on Multiple Levels". Information Visualization - Towards Multivariate Network Visualization (Dagstuhl Seminar 13201). Springer Verlag.

briatte commented 8 years ago

There's good stuff also from a Japanese guy that I have somewhere on disk. I'll start the subsection when I have at least 4-5 links.

taniki commented 8 years ago

This one ?

Akera, A. 2007. “Constructing a Representation for an Ecology of Knowledge: Methodological Advances in the Integration of Knowledge and Its Various Contexts.” Social Studies of Science 37(3):413–41.

briatte commented 8 years ago

Nah — I know awesome lists should be tolerant, but I'm almost literally allergic to ANT…

taniki commented 8 years ago

I can understand that. I will be curious about your reference then (:

I am also trying to find a reference that is not too deep into a geospatial framework

briatte commented 8 years ago

Found it – Liu and Murata, "Detecting Communities in K-partite K-uniform (Hyper) Networks", 2011.

See also 2010 conference paper.

See also 2009 working paper by different authors.

Problem – knowledge of hypergraphs seems less 'stabilised' than for other graphs. In general, it seems to me, network analysis is still quite experimental / shy about exploring k-partite graphs when k > 1. Shall we still have a section on them?

briatte commented 8 years ago

Okay, for now I'm just gonna add the Murata Lab to the list of non-US research groups. Perhaps we'll come back to bi/tri/k-partite networks later on.