If need be, use rlist and pipeR

[briatte]

rlist, by @renkun-ken, looks like a brilliant way to manipulate lists. My only regret is that the functions are named list.verb instead of list_verb.

Suggestion – Use it if lapply usage becomes cryptic.

pipeR looks cool too, even though I would prefer to keep things simple and stick with just %>%.

[briatte]

Closing, as introducing anything beyond `%>% would be confusing teaching-wise.

Both packages still look interesting, but functionalities probably have acquired almost-identical equivalents in purrr since the issue was opened.

See also answer at https://github.com/renkun-ken/rlist/issues/119