Closed gnutix closed 1 year ago
@BenMorel Could you merge #85 first, and then I'll rebase this PR on master and do the changes you requested ? (otherwise if I move __toString()
's implementation in toString()
first and then rebase, I'll get tons of conflicts)
@gnutix I was actually planning to do the opposite, as I haven't reviewed #85 yet!
Plus, you said in #85 that you needed a bug fix from here?
All the review comments have been fixed. I think I found a way to do the changes without having to worry about conflicts... we'll see.
Plus, you said in https://github.com/brick/date-time/pull/85 that you needed a bug fix from here?
I cherry-picked the same bugfix commit in both branches. Whichever gets merged first puts the commit into master, and the other one will drop it upon rebase.
Thank you, @gnutix! I'm slightly concerned about YearMonthRange::toISOString()
as I cannot confirm whether this is part of ISO 8601; but it is close enough to other representations, and if ISO 8601 did standardize this, I'm confident it would have this format.
Can you please rebase #85?
Can you please rebase #85?
Sure, first thing tomorrow morning. After it's merged, would you mind doing a release ?
@gnutix I'll do what I can :wink:
I removed
Month::getName()
andDayOfWeek::toISOString()
. PR is ready for merge IMHO.