Closed ariutta closed 4 years ago
It's one thing to decide to switch, but it's another to actually perform the switch. Someone has to identify all the places in related and potentially 3rd party tools and use cases where the .txt
is being used. Maybe there is 1 or 2. Maybe there are dozens??
Or, as mentioned, we have to now commit to maintaining both either manually (e.g., by convention) or by developing and maintaining a automated system.
My vote would be to just have one. Is it really worth having a tsv? Whomever it is "worth" having the tsv needs to take on the extra work.
Primary reason to use TSV: it displays nicely autmatically on GH. I've made the change everywhere I can, but I think this is as far as I'll be taking it. If anyone wants to finish the switch, it's an open task.
I'll be on this as soon as possible. But in master
please go ahead. As long as it compiles, that's where these things happen. Ideally, work in a branch, remove the file, see how many tests fail. We hope to have Jenkins online soon again.
Oh, yes, let's remove the .txt version.
I notice the .txt and .tsv versions have diverged.
Fixed in master.
In this pull request, we decided to switch from
.txt
to.tsv
for the files in org.bridgedb.bio/resources/org/bridgedb/bio/. But at the moment, we still have both, and I notice they are not synced.To avoid confusion, can we go ahead and replace the
.txt
files with the.tsv
files? Or if that's not possible right away, can we automatically sync the.txt
and.tsv
files somehow whenever there's a new commit?