Open ariutta opened 9 years ago
Hi, I don't know the science to say if the above four BridgeDb DataSources are all gramene.gene.
But if they are the correct fix is NOT to add urn:miriam:gramene.gene into the four rows but rather to merge the 4 BridgeDb dataSources into 1.
They either are all four the same in which case one BridgeDb DataSource is required or they are not the same in which case there should be four different Miriam Urn patterns.
Anders, I think we need to ask the people from the rice portal... Otherwise, I second your comments and Christian's suggestion... but let's get input from the rice people first, before making decisions...
Sounds good. @egonw, would you like to initiate the contact with the rice experts? If not, I can try to find out who to contact.
In the past I have had very good and fast replies from the Miriam people themselves and especially from Nick Juty.
I'll contact him this coming week. Thanks, Christian.
I got a response from Nick:
"1. http://identifiers.org/ensembl.plant/ATMG01360 [possible identifiers.org URI for http://www.gramene.org/Arabidopsis_thaliana/Gene/Summary?g=ATMG01360-TAIR-G]
He said he thinks it may be possible to add a collection for LOC identifiers, but he would need to look into it further first.
In datasources.txt, Gramene Genes should have the Miriam identifier
urn:miriam:gramene.gene
.Should we create new Miriam identifiers also for the following rows?