Closed briederer closed 2 years ago
The Docs for this PR are deployed! 🥳 You can find them here.
Please make sure that you have documented your new feature properly:
Need an opinion by @fzierler on how we treat the systematic uncertainties for things like relative error and region of datapoints.
I don't understand what you mean by that.
Need an opinion by @fzierler on how we treat the systematic uncertainties for things like relative error and region of datapoints.
I don't understand what you mean by that.
I mean if we want to have something like relerror(D::DataPoint)
how is the correct way to handle systematic uncertainties?
Should we then have one tuple with (stat_err .+ sys_err)./val
or return two tuples for the errors independently?
I am also not sure if we even should keep the systematic error after all.
I am also not sure if we even should keep the systematic error after all.
I agree. Let's get rid of them for now
Moved to #25
Switched the order of upper and lower error for datapoints because it seems more reasonable to use it in this order
(lower,upper)
.Added some default constructors and type-specific ones which are needed when calling some functions with
DataPoint
types as an argument.Need an opinion by @fzierler on how we treat the systematic uncertainties for things like relative error and region of datapoints.