Closed caub closed 4 years ago
We're only double-inspecting on the engine262 engine, so maybe we should make the others do the inspect themselves, and 'run' will always return a string? The current code doesn't look correct for n> ({ x: 1 }).
n> ({ x: 1 })
Also there's a merge conflict.
ok ready!
Thanks! Deployed
We're only double-inspecting on the engine262 engine, so maybe we should make the others do the inspect themselves, and 'run' will always return a string? The current code doesn't look correct for
n> ({ x: 1 })
.Also there's a merge conflict.