Closed JaelssonLima closed 7 months ago
Now it worked by doing: data.over_sampling=[1, 5, 1]. J.
Hi Jaelsson,
You might want to use oversampling=[1, 5, 5] instead of [1, 5, 1], this way you're oversampling the nuisance parameters of both likelihoods. I think with the other setup the nuisance parameter 'M' would not get oversampled and it would probably be faster to do so, as the Pantheon likelihood is fast to run, if I remember correctly. On the other hand, if you find your setup works well then don't worry about it.
For clarity, the 1 refers to the sampling rate of the cosmological parameters (normally set to 1), the second entry refers to the oversampling rate of the nuisance parameters in the first likelihood with nuisance parameters in your likelihood list, in this case Planck, and the third refers to the oversampling rate of the nuisance parameters in the second likelihood with nuisance parameters, in this case Pantheon.
Best, Thejs
thank you very much Att, J.
Hi,
So, recently I've been trying to use PlanckTTTEEE+Pantheon. But there is an error when processing the likelihoods...
How would be a PlanckTTTEEE+Pantheon.param file for it to work correctly? Best regards, Jaelsson Lima.