Open shntnu opened 3 years ago
We use Pearson correlation.
We use Pearson correlation.
Got it. At long last, I've become more fond (again) of cosine similarity (which is closely related to Pearson [1]), because it is on a better footing in ML research, more intuitive [2], and will generally lead to very similar results given the way we normalize data.
I haven't tested it out thoroughly, so I don't recommend switching over yet, but please keep me posted in case you guys do test it out.
From https://rpubs.com/shantanu/pearson_cosine
Relevant paper: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1087057113501390
Very interesting! Will give cosine similarity a try!
@jccaicedo Can you clarify what is the preferred similarity / distance metric for profiles (in this experiment)?