Closed toneillbroad closed 5 years ago
Dan, regarding your proposal of moving the links
field from the primary id of the from
table to the foreign key field of the to
table, I'm ok with that, but that changes the nature of the field from a links
json array to a singular link
object containing table_name
and column_name
correct? Are you suggesting that if all primary key fields are named id
that the new link
object on the foreign key would simply contain table_name
? My vote would be for the former vs. the latter.
Tables, assets and generated Jade schema for review.