We're running into some WhamG memory issues on some samples, but we can't bump the memory on a per-sample basis without handling pf_reads_improper_pairs & pct_exc_total; I've no concept of what reasonable values for these would be. The mem_per_bam_size * bam_size + mem_bam_offset calculation would be easier to influence, but due to the fixed 0.0 value it can't be edited.
https://github.com/broadinstitute/gatk-sv/blob/dc92e9f4bc46a1ab19459b515c24c9747a73a967/wdl/Whamg.wdl#L220
This value is fixed at 0.0 and can't be edited. This is later used in a calculation, but it the result will always be 0.
https://github.com/broadinstitute/gatk-sv/blob/main/wdl/Whamg.wdl#L225-L229
We're running into some WhamG memory issues on some samples, but we can't bump the memory on a per-sample basis without handling
pf_reads_improper_pairs
&pct_exc_total
; I've no concept of what reasonable values for these would be. Themem_per_bam_size * bam_size + mem_bam_offset
calculation would be easier to influence, but due to the fixed0.0
value it can't be edited.