At the moment, when you sort the variants table by clinical significance, the sort is alphabetically by label (such that Descending order results in Uncertain Significance being sorted at the top).
It would be nice if sorting was done by the level of significance. Do we map these levels to ints in the database in a way that the sorting could be done that way, rather than alphabetically by its label? This might also help with sorting consistency moving forward if the labels change.
At the moment, when you sort the variants table by clinical significance, the sort is alphabetically by label (such that Descending order results in Uncertain Significance being sorted at the top).
It would be nice if sorting was done by the level of significance. Do we map these levels to ints in the database in a way that the sorting could be done that way, rather than alphabetically by its label? This might also help with sorting consistency moving forward if the labels change.