Closed hgaiser closed 6 years ago
@hgaiser
Yeah, I noticed that issue, and we should be consistent about it...so let's try to make sure batch dimension is included
Yeah with these changes I got a successful model summary (not really the same as compiling I guess).
Are you able to train?
No I didn't try training yet (are the loss layers used already?). I only got a seemingly logical model summary.
This PR fixes some small issues that caused the model not to compile.
In addition I noticed that all inputs are shaped including their batch dimension. I wasn't completely aware of this and I'm not sure the current implementation handles it correctly (ie. it might assume a shape of (None, 4) while it is actually (None, None, 4)). @jhung0 @0x00b1 are you aware of this?