Closed tseemann closed 8 years ago
There might be something else going on, I'll do more investigation and re-open if I find it.
Sorry to bother you.
Hello, I met the same problem as yours. The corrected fasta hasn't got any changes and the log of pilon shows the coverage is 0. Do you have dealt with your problem ?
Pilon version 1.22 Wed Mar 15 16:38:30 2017 -0400
Genome: test.fasta
Fixing snps, indels
Input genome size: 1022840
Processing tig00000488|arrow:1-779472
Processing tig00000361|arrow:1-243368
tig00000361|arrow:1-243368 log:
unpaired /home/xiatian/polish/Illumina_correct_pacbio/2_samtools_output/bwa_sort.bam: coverage 0
Total Reads: 199348, Coverage: 0, minDepth: 5
Confirmed 0 of 243368 bases (0.00%)
Corrected 0 snps; 0 ambiguous bases; corrected 0 small insertions totaling 0 bases, 0 small deletions totaling 0 bases
Finished processing tig00000361|arrow:1-243368
tig00000488|arrow:1-779472 log:
unpaired /home/xiatian/polish/Illumina_correct_pacbio/2_samtools_output/bwa_sort.bam: coverage 0
Total Reads: 765929, Coverage: 0, minDepth: 5
Confirmed 0 of 779472 bases (0.00%)
Corrected 0 snps; 0 ambiguous bases; corrected 0 small insertions totaling 0 bases, 0 small deletions totaling 0 bases
Finished processing tig00000488|arrow:1-779472
Writing updated tig00000361|arrow|pilon to /home/xiatian/polish/Illumina_correct_pacbio/4_pilon_output/test.fasta
Writing updated tig00000488|arrow|pilon to /home/xiatian/polish/Illumina_correct_pacbio/4_pilon_output/test.fasta
Mean unpaired coverage: 0
Mean total coverage: 0
@CVan19 I think it was because I had |
in my fasta IDs.
18
I usually use Pilon with a single sequence but we are correcting 3 contigs (chr and 2 plasmids) and am getting unusual output:
gives
But the output files are wrong:
The changes file is empty, and the corrected fasta hasn't got any changes.
There are changes. If you run it with a single contig alone it seems to give changes.
The BAM looks are ok too:
The aligner was BWA MEM, and the RAM for pilon was 16 GB.
Any ideas?
@AnnaSyme