Closed gwaybio closed 4 years ago
This calls config["aggregate"] but that's not in this PR. Should it be?
This calls config["aggregate"] but that's not in this PR. Should it be?
Great catch. It should be... yes, note that I did the lazy thing and added the aggregate
config options in https://github.com/broadinstitute/pooled-cell-painting-profiling-recipe/pull/8/commits/e606fe12d925d2aa4b046e4728452cec5aaa2640#diff-04ba2a82a13772907c6597e5ae1f54f2R53-R66
The "lazy" part means that we won't have to deal with merge conflicts by two pull requests dealing with the same file changing. In general, github makes merging nearly a non-trivial problem (and this ease of asynchronous development is one of the reasons github is so great!). (It can get VERY messy too - just something to be mindful of)
thanks for this succinct review @ErinWeisbart - ready for your re-review when you get a chance!
This script is the next downstream step after #8 and uses
pycytominer.aggregate()
.Currently, the output of this script (using CP074A as an example) are two files: