PoolQ should use a versioning scheme like W.X.Y.Z. The W version for PoolQ 3.x should be considered 3; this represents a significant milestone in PoolQ implementation or functionality. The remaining X.Y.Z versions should follow a basic semver versioning scheme.
I propose this because the 3 version of PoolQ represented a significant and meaningful change in PoolQ. Making a major version change to PoolQ now and following semantic versioning would pose communication problems with collaborators or other users of PoolQ. Adding a W version lets us freeze that most-significant digit while allowing us to follow proper semantic versioning in all other ways.
PoolQ should use a versioning scheme like
W.X.Y.Z
. TheW
version for PoolQ 3.x should be considered 3; this represents a significant milestone in PoolQ implementation or functionality. The remainingX.Y.Z
versions should follow a basic semver versioning scheme.I propose this because the
3
version of PoolQ represented a significant and meaningful change in PoolQ. Making a major version change to PoolQ now and following semantic versioning would pose communication problems with collaborators or other users of PoolQ. Adding aW
version lets us freeze that most-significant digit while allowing us to follow proper semantic versioning in all other ways.