Nonofficial RU 864-869 ISM band

[Vini74]

Is it possible to add experimental ISM band for Russian Federation? All parameters are the same as in band_eu863_870.go except frequencies.

Ch# Freq Modulation duty cycle default channels 1 864,10 MHz MuliSF 125kHz 0,1% or LBT yes 2 864,30 MHz MuliSF 125kHz 0,1% or LBT yes 3 864,50 MHz MuliSF 125kHz 0,1% or LBT yes 4 864,70 MHz MuliSF 125kHz 0,1% or LBT RX2 864,90 MHz SF12 125kHz 0,1% or LBT 5 868,85 MHz MuliSF 125kHz -
6 869,05 MHz MuliSF 125kHz -

[brocaar]

Could you share any documents / drafts describing this experimental ISM band?

[Vini74]

Draft specifications for LoRaWAN Regional Parameters attached.

----- On 27 Dec, 2016, at 22:22, Orne Brocaar notifications@github.com wrote:

Could you share any documents / drafts describing this experimental ISM band?

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub , or mute the thread .

[brocaar]

Hi @Vini74 it seems that you can't attach files to a github issue by mail. Could you send this file to my e-mail address (see http://github.com/brocaar)? Or attach it to this issue using the GitHub web-interface?

[brocaar]

Hi @Vini74 because of NY my previous message have been slipped through. Could you please send me an e-mail with the pdf attached or add it using the GitHub web-interface? It seems that attachements are stripped when replying to the issue by mail. Thanks and an happy new year!

[Vini74]

LoRaWAN_RU-868-Regional_Parameters_v0_1.pdf

[brocaar]

Cheers! I'll re-open the issue so that I can keep track of all feature requests until they are implemented :-)

[Vini74]

LoRaWAN_RU-868-Regional_Parameters_v1.0.pdf

Dear Orne,

We have completed additional tests in the allowed frequency bands and concluded that in the 864.0 MHz range chip 1301 has significant decrease in receiver sensitivity. That is why we have to reassign frequencies as follows: 864.1 MHz -> 864.5 MHz 864.3 MHz -> 864.7 MHz 864.5 MHz -> 864.9 MHz RX2 - 869.05 MHz

Please find updated documentation in attached file. Could you please make necessary modifications at your earliest convenience? Thank you. Also please take my apologies for the fuss.

[brocaar]

@Vini74 I've updated this in the master branch. Could you test these changes?

[Vini74]

@brocaar Your changes look like good! I shall try build this revision.

[brocaar]

@Vini74 can I close this issue (the latest draft is in the latest LoRa Server release)?

[Vini74]

@brocaar Yes of course! Thank you!