Closed DavidChristiansen closed 7 years ago
Well it can be brought back in line. We never did catch up to go over it. It's a good feature and implemented, so let's not throw it away
Okies.
I have created a fork with the merge. Fork #688 So far, I only got 3 hard conflicts mainly with the readme, and resources.
I've been getting familiarized with this PR for a while, I have tested its functionality and seems to be working fine. No weird errors ATM.
The only thing I would add, is the ability to generate secrets based on a configuration property rather than hard-coded value, allowing secrets to be bigger if needed.
@brockallen Things are in sync now - Over to you for final pull.
Given that Brock has stated that he is no longer in a position to maintain MBR, I have taken the decision to merge this PR into Dev. All compiles/green based on current head.
Note: You may require to perform a DB migration to reflect schema changes to the UserAccount object.
I think this PR is dead, no? It's quite out of sync now.