Closed mpmilano closed 11 years ago
This should just be a one-line change in dict.py --- change pair[1] to pair[1][0].
I'm off in writing land and don't want to deal w/regression testing right now, but this should be trivial to do.
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 6:20 AM, Matthew Milano notifications@github.comwrote:
Right now, constructing a list from a dictionary will get you a list of key,value pairs. It should only get you a list of keys.
This is the only remaining bug preventing the test locals-class.py from working.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/brownplt/lambda-py/issues/52 .
I've fixed the dict.list issue but, the locals-class.py test now is failing due to interactions with the new attribute lookup regime: locals() is reporting local variables of functions used in class and method initialization.
Locals is broken right now due to the merge. I'm trying to figure out what happened to it.
~matthew
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Alejandro Martinez < notifications@github.com> wrote:
I've fixed the dict.list issue but, the locals-class.py test now is failing due to interactions with the new attribute lookup regime: locals() is reporting local variables of functions used in class and method initialization.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/brownplt/lambda-py/issues/52#issuecomment-15373634 .
Right now, constructing a list from a dictionary will get you a list of key,value pairs. It should only get you a list of keys.
This is the only remaining bug preventing the test locals-class.py from working.