Awkward function name from sugar

[sorawee]

for lam(x): x end():
  1
end

results in

<function:for-body<line 1, column 0>>

[blerner]

I'm not particularly concerned by this: this is a particularly obtuse way of using lambdas and for-syntax, so it's not likely to come up particularly often. And while we need some kind of name here, I don't think this one's particularly worse than others. The display-name of a function is not part of the semantics of Pyret...

[jpolitz]

Yeah this seems pretty reasonable. I don't know of a qualitatively different alternative than using the location of the for body.