Closed dcousens closed 7 years ago
@dominictarr thoughts?
sure! good idea, make a new module and then add a pr so that this module depends on it
@calvinmetcalf relevant to https://github.com/crypto-browserify/cipher-base? In terms of, is it worth extracting this to that module?
yes probably a good idea
Any ideas about name for this new module?
browserify-md5?
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 5:36 AM Kirill Fomichev notifications@github.com wrote:
Any ideas about name for this new module?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/crypto-browserify/sha.js/issues/25#issuecomment-203346195
@calvinmetcalf no, this is other issue :smile: support node streams in sha.js and ripemd160 (and in md5 that we want to extract) without cipher-base
ah then like hash-base or something
nice name, I'll try do this in nearest time!
@fanatid maybe find out what the padding standard is called, and use that with the name.
Thanks @fanatid
Now just for ripemd160 :+1:
Right now
hash.js
is a really good plug-and-play model for block hashs. Perhaps we could extract it to a module where it can be used to easily implement block hashes that support streaming.This would at least stop me having to duplicate it for ripemd160.