Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
On 25-3-2013 20:20, Stephen Lee wrote:
> It gets my vote.
On 25-3-2013 20:53, Paul Dingemans wrote:
> Mine as well. It looks much better than the blurry old one (no offense meant
Ben).
On 25-3-2013 22:21, Ben Buxton wrote:
> Yep some proper sharp icons like this are just whats needed. Though one
comment is that they show just a 2x2 grid in them, which might be too different
from the current 3x3 grid icon. Is it feasible to maintain that structure/cage
visibility in these icons?
Original comment by paul.din...@gmail.com
on 30 Mar 2013 at 7:48
> 2013/4/5 Alexander Tesfamichael <alex.tesfamichael@gmail.com>
>
> Hi Ben,
> I discussed your point with Pimm, we talked a little and the following is
the conclusion we reached.
> The discussion will always be how much familiarity do you want to
sacrifice to make things look better?
> When switching to 2x2 we indeed lose a little familiarity. It is however
minor, and since the name stays the same there is no risk people would ever
think MathDoku is not the same app, MathDoku, anymore. Other than the small
loss of familiarity there were no cons we could see.
> When looking at pro's, this icon is a lot better readable on small (ldpi)
displays. On big hdpi+ displays and maybe even on mdpi (havent tested) it has a
readable, solvable puzzle as icon which is of course fun. Lastly the more fine
detail you add by using small numbers, the harder it becomes to make them look
sharp in their lower dpi versions. At some point something is simply too small
to make look sharp.
> Hopefully you'll see why Pimm thought, and I agree, an icon with less
detail is better. Especially with the added bonus of a real puzzle as icon. If
you still are convinced 3x3 would be better. Please get back to me so we can
make the best choice.
> Yours,
> Alexander Tesfamichael
Original comment by paul.din...@gmail.com
on 9 Apr 2013 at 9:49
Solved in r221.
Original comment by paul.din...@gmail.com
on 9 Apr 2013 at 9:49
Tested Revision 226 on various devices: All show the new icon correctly
Original comment by em...@srlee.com
on 9 Apr 2013 at 10:24
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
paul.din...@gmail.com
on 30 Mar 2013 at 7:47Attachments: