Closed HyperSoop closed 1 year ago
After some testing, i can say: azul is great. Zulu gives a bit more FPS than Graal EE does, and conserves a lot on memory. If you can do your own testing and tuning, we could get a nice additional bit of performance! and the joy of running MC 1.19.3 on 220mb ram.
Its important to note there are basically 2 Azul JDKs: the "regular" Zulu one which is just OpenJDK like Adoptium, and "Prime" which is the special proprietary linux-only one: https://www.azul.com/downloads/?package=jdk
Regular OpenJDK does indeed work better than GraalVM EE on many machines, espcially with light modpacks, and it uses less RAM.
In my testing, I saw no evidence that Zulu was any different than Adoptium, but I'd love to be proven wrong if someone wants to run the benchmark script.
Wait, so graal EE is not much better in most cases? You should probably mention that somewhere
I think i'm stupid
Wait, so graal EE is not much better in most cases? You should probably mention that somewhere
It seems to depend on the environment. Graal uses more RAM and background CPU, so it seems to shine on higher end PCs, but there are also reports of it helping low end computers.
It also seems to help content-heavy mod loadouts more.
This is all just my subjective/informal impression though, I am hesitant to add much to the guide without some testing at least.
Oh also I accidentally mashed the reopen key on mobile, but feel free to reopen if you wish.
After a big/medium story I discovered that the launcher TL Legacy auto-downloads the Azul JDK which is stupid fast, way faster than GraalVM EE. It is mentioned in this guide:
But the thing is, I'm on windows and this mysterious Azul JDK bundled by TLL runs for me (even after routing Prism Lancher to use it). And it is fully compatible with Simply Optimized (currently only the latest 1.18.x release tested). There clearly is something going on, Azul can be used on windows.