I think it's better to change ; to && as && means that the second command is only ran when the first command has succeeded. I guess we do not want to run the second command when the first has not succeeded.
edit: I now see powershell does not support && 😒. I think we have to first check if the first command succeeded and then do the second command?
I think it's better to change
;to&&as&&means that the second command is only ran when the first command has succeeded. I guess we do not want to run the second command when the first has not succeeded.edit: I now see powershell does not support
&&😒. I think we have to first check if the first command succeeded and then do the second command?_Originally posted by @jwijenbergh in https://github.com/bornobob/Notepad--/pull/22#discussion_r530934410_