Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
I furthermore suggest that it would be nice to have a way to filter the "bad"
pictures, as they are often randomly placed acrose several albums and the only
way to
find them currently is to browse the albums, which is of course quite slow.
Original comment by davito...@gmail.com
on 9 Jan 2009 at 8:49
It's a long/odd problem/feature too ;-)
Since 0.3, this trouble is minimized ...
because the use of exiv2 : there shouldn't have trouble about reading iptc tag
anymore
since recently : there shouldn't have trouble about reading a bad utf8 comment
(always decode with replaing bad chars)
the only trouble which can come is the "exif flash value" ... because I can't
find a
full list of values (vendors put what they want here ;-( ), and because we
haven't
any fallback (except perhaps : even number -> flash off, odd number -> flash on
...
but we must be sure of that)
so, in the near future (when we have got a fallback or a full list) : import
troubles
should gone ... every pictures should be imported well in jbrout (and since 0.3
: all
pictures with no exif work too !!!)
so 2 solutions :
- continue to fill our list of valid exif flash value (but can be hard/long)
- find a fallback for unknowns exif flash value
but in the future : import should always be fine ! so no need to "filter bad",
or
implement a "continue dialog"
Original comment by manat...@gmail.com
on 9 Jan 2009 at 12:40
ok, good news. But I have dozens of pictures which jBrout imported without
saying
anything but which show a zigzag or a cross instead of a thumbnail. I can't
tell you
how many I have since precisely I don't have any way to sort them out. A few of
them
can be corrected by asking for a thumbnail regeneration, but most of the times
this
does not work. So I'd like to have a way to extract all the pictures jBrout
considers
wrong and see if there is something I can do about them.
BTW, I doubt the flash tag update will solve my issue, 99.9% of my pictures were
taken without any flash. The one I sent you (A151_IMG.jpg) was taken without
flash.
1/1000s at 100 ISO, I didn't need one ;-)
Original comment by davito...@gmail.com
on 9 Jan 2009 at 1:00
Maybe the solution is that Jbrout automatically add an IPTC tag (Invalid_exif
for
example) to these incorrect pictures?
It will be really easy to implement and very useful (for me too, there was a
lot of
pictures with cross and zigzag when i've load my pictures with v. 0.2). It was
really
boring to select all these pictures and to reload thumbnail
Original comment by gautier....@gmail.com
on 9 Jan 2009 at 1:11
To davitofrg : The flash tag update issue happen even if pictures are taken
without
flash... Some combinations of flash/red eye/strobes etc... are not known by
jbrout
and it cause the bug... This of course include combinations with no flash!
Original comment by gautier....@gmail.com
on 9 Jan 2009 at 1:20
fixed in r151
Original comment by manat...@gmail.com
on 9 Jan 2009 at 4:00
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
davito...@gmail.com
on 9 Jan 2009 at 8:45