nus-se-script
commented
1 year ago Team's Response
No details provided by team.
The 'Original' Bug
[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]
[Developer Guide] Missing important user stories
Note from the teaching team: This bug was reported during the Part II (Evaluating Documents) stage of the PE. You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.
There are many missing important user stories for commands such as add, remark, grade, new, and many more. Even for simple commands, no matter how trivial they are, should be included in the section.
[original: nus-cs2103-AY2223S1/pe-interim#1012] [original labels: severity.Medium type.DocumentationBug]
Their Response to the 'Original' Bug
[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]
Thank you for pointing this out. We accept that we should have included a longer list of user stories, however, these other features that u have mentioned are included in the use cases so developers who read our entire DG will be made known to them.
We do not see this as a problem that warrants a medium severity as these documents can be updated from time to time, and we recognised that there are {More to be added}, thus the list is non-exhaustive.
Therefore we feel this only warrants a LOW severity
Items for the Tester to Verify
:question: Issue duplicate status
Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)
- [ ] I disagree
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
User story table is missing user stories of the "nice to have" level. There are many features that have been implemented but are not found in the user stories, there user stories should be at the "nice to have level". It would be good to include those to as good software engineering practice.