search

bryanhce / pe

0 stars 0 forks source link

Unused definitions in the DG for use cases #27

Open bryanhce opened 1 year ago

bryanhce commented 1 year ago

Screenshot 2022-11-11 at 5.29.21 PM.png

Screenshot 2022-11-11 at 5.29.31 PM.png

In the first screenshot, we see that system is defined as user, but in the 2nd screenshot we see that TAB is directly being used and system is missing from the use cases.

soc-se-bot commented 1 year ago

Team's Response

System is defined to be TAB while Actor is defined to be the user, our team feels there is no issues present with the definitions.

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue response

Team chose [response.Rejected]

Reason for disagreement: I might not have explained the issue well. Let me try again. Instead of using "system" in your use cases, you used "TAB". As such rendering your definition of "System is TAB" not meaningful. Likewise for the "Actor" and "user", the same problem is repeated as well. In addition, the definition of "actor" could be more specific instead of "user", for example using Professors in place of user would be more clear.