Open wtimme opened 4 years ago
as a very low hanging fruit, I would add
<meta name="apple-itunes-app" content="app-id=592990211, affiliate-data=myAffiliateData, app-argument=">
to the page header. "myAffiliateData" should be filled with actual data or removed (is optional).
Docs here https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/AppleApplications/Reference/SafariWebContent/PromotingAppswithAppBanners/PromotingAppswithAppBanners.html
This will create an install/open banner on iOS devices on the pages where it is added (can be dismissed "permanently" by the user until they delete their browsing history).
Good idea! I've added the banner to the page. This is what it looks like now:
regarding iD editing, this is blocked (not shown) on the osm website for phone-size devices (not sure if it works on tablets)
we should change the logo, both on the website and in the app.
there should also be a short text, maybe the one from the app description, in order to make the page findable by search engines. Keywords are openstreetmap, osm, editing, editor, iOS, iPhone, iPad, map, mobile editor, etc. Each of these should appear in the intro text, possibly more than once.
I also got a warning about "insecure" elements, looking at the page source, the only http:// links I found are in the header doctype file:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
try to change these 2 to https://
I suggest using github sites for hosting the content, that would make the server and deployment part very easy.
We need an imprint on the site and other legally formal documents, like a privacy doc.
Am Mi., 9. Sept. 2020 um 13:05 Uhr schrieb Tobias <notifications@github.com
:
We need an imprint on the site and other legally formal documents, like a privacy doc.
I am not sure, but I would not think so, this is a US hosted site, isn't it?
For me the site exists only to host the universal link. I didn’t intend for the site to be visited in a browser necessarily, since the site containing the referring link can detect whether the app is installed by checking if gomaposm:// is a valid URI (as I understand things).
If people want to make something more of the page that’s fine. But @wtimme’s #1 and #2 are the only items I’m concerned with.
The thing is, from a legal point of view it does not matter if the page only opens and immediately redirects. It's still a Datenverarbeitung / data processing. I don't thinks it a big deal and it's great to have the feature, but we should address it at some point.
sent from a phone
On 9. Sep 2020, at 19:34, Tobias notifications@github.com wrote:
It's still a Datenverarbeitung / data processing. I don't thinks it a big deal and it's great to have the feature, but we should address it at some point.
it’s a German (imprint) and EU (privacy) thing, it is not necessary for an US site (maybe something has to be added according to federal or state law, no idea).
… and EU (privacy) thing, it is not necessary for an US site …
As I said, that't not my understanding and I read (eg.) https://gdpr.eu/compliance-checklist-us-companies/ the same way and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/8/88/GDPR_Position_Paper.pdf as well.
sent from a phone
On 9. Sep 2020, at 21:25, Tobias notifications@github.com wrote:
As I said, that't not my understanding and I read (eg.) https://gdpr.eu/compliance-checklist-us-companies/ the same way and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/8/88/GDPR_Position_Paper.pdf as well.
which personal data do you refer to in the context of gomap?
Nobody has ever been processed outside of the EU, because although they claim that the scope goes beyond the jurisdiction, reality is that the effect remains within in EU.
Ideally, we would not use an app-dedicated domain, but rather openstreetmap.org, as nobody except Go Map!! users can use our links proper. (The gomaposm.com domain defeats the idea of the Universal Link, as far as I understand them. I would not send my Android buddy such a link, because they cannot download Go Map!!. Instead, I would probably share a openstreetmap.org link, since it is truely universal.)
I suggest we ask the openstreetmap.org maintainers to include the ‘.well-known‘ file so that users are able to visit openstreetmap.org links, which would then open Go Map!!. If our app was supporting all of the links (editing nodes/ways/relations, viewing objects/areas), we would be a true iOS native companion app.
The last time I asked about this, I got sceptic feedback ("Wait, we are supposed to include a file in order to support iOS?"), but I think it's worth it to ask again.
Users would be able to seamlessly open openstreetmap.org link on their iOS device, right in Go Map!!. I don't know about your use cases, but I would welcome such an integration.
I agree that having the file on openstreetmap.org is the ideal case. I expect that a pull request that enabled "Edit on iOS/Android" and included the app association file would be accepted.
Let's discuss the goals of the website.
.well-known/apple-app-site-association
fileThe last point important for desktop users who get a gomaposm.com link and want to make use of it.
What's your point of view here, @bryceco? @dieterdreist, do you have any input/expectations?