brycelelbach wg21_p2195_electronic_straw_polls issues

brycelelbach / wg21_p2195_electronic_straw_polls

The Standard C++ Committee should support electronic straw polls to increase stakeholder engagement and flexibility in decision making.

2 stars 2 forks source link

issues

Newest

Newest Most commented Recently updated Oldest Least commented Least recently updated

Make votes and comments will now be anonymous

#33 brycelelbach closed 3 years ago
0
The term "status quo" already has well-defined meaning

#32 griwes closed 4 years ago
1
"We are will not" typo

#31 ben-craig closed 4 years ago
1
Train diagram implies yearly C++ release

#30 ben-craig closed 4 years ago
1
Edits after discusssion with Ville

#29 jfbastien closed 4 years ago
0
s/Language Evolution/Evolution/

#28 brycelelbach closed 4 years ago
0
Add Ville as an author

#27 brycelelbach closed 4 years ago
0
Mini-train model

#26 brycelelbach closed 4 years ago
0
Add David Stone as an author

#25 davidstone closed 4 years ago
0
Bolder

#24 jfbastien closed 4 years ago
1
Good faith

#23 jfbastien closed 4 years ago
0
More updates

#22 jfbastien closed 4 years ago
0
A few clarifications in the intro

#21 jfbastien closed 4 years ago
0
Add a process for withdrawing a poll

#20 brycelelbach closed 4 years ago
2
Consider requiring P papers for electronic straw polls

#19 brycelelbach closed 4 years ago
1
Add a provision for enabling voting by those with disabilities or unable to access the voting system

#18 brycelelbach closed 4 years ago
0
Omit paragraph about INCITS requiring two meetings a year

#17 brycelelbach closed 4 years ago
0
Add an FAQ item on public attribution of votes

#16 brycelelbach closed 4 years ago
0
Clarify what happens when a poll closes

#15 brycelelbach closed 4 years ago
0
Split out a "Consensus Determining Process" from the "Consensus Building Process" section

#14 brycelelbach closed 4 years ago
0
Clarify how different poll types impact the status quo

#13 brycelelbach closed 4 years ago
0
Consider making voting results known during voting

#12 brycelelbach closed 4 years ago
4
Consider making voter eligibility per subgroup

#11 brycelelbach closed 4 years ago
3
Improve comparison of asynchronous and synchronous consensus building

#10 brycelelbach closed 4 years ago
1
Add data about the growing (L)EWG backlog during remote operations

#9 brycelelbach closed 4 years ago
2
Polls should link papers, GitHub issues and minutes

#8 brycelelbach closed 4 years ago
0
Beta period for the notification and polling period

#7 brycelelbach closed 4 years ago
0
Don't require asynchronous straw polls for decision straw polls at face to face meetings

#6 brycelelbach closed 4 years ago
1
Require that voters confirm that they have read the proposal and require voters provide a comment

#5 inbal2l closed 4 years ago
4
Consider deleting detailed voter results after a short time period

#4 ben-craig closed 4 years ago
4
Add rationale for not using secret polling

#3 ben-craig closed 4 years ago
2
Async polling shouldn't be mandatory for study groups

#2 hanickadot closed 4 years ago
1
Tighten voter eligibility

#1 ogiroux closed 4 years ago
3