Closed bsamseth closed 5 years ago
With the addition of ttable in quiescense we have a stastistically significant improvement.
Times (ms): [5973 5959 5714 5963 5863 6019 5671 5914 6051 6026] Average: 5.9153e+03 Std: 1.2324e+02 CI 95%: [5.6738e+03, 6.1568e+03] Nodes constant: TRUE Nodes: 6137342 Nodes/second: 1.0375e+03 CI 95%: [1.0817e+03, 9.9683e+02]
Times (ms): [6931 7072 7091 6792 6577 6563 6502 6602 6277 6537] Average: 6.6944e+03 Std: 2.5318e+02 CI 95%: [6.1982e+03, 7.1906e+03] Nodes constant: TRUE Nodes: 7000990 Nodes/second: 1.0458e+03 CI 95%: [1.1295e+03, 9.7363e+02]
No notable change in ELO. Preliminary testing suggests a minor (~5 ELO) downgrade. Might be random, might be a need for more Mb in tt due to more positions being stored. Merging for now.
Minor speed improvement. Nothing major, do not expect big changes in eval. But still, should be superior, and does not add notable complexity.
v1.7.1
Total time (ms) : 5915 Nodes searched : 6398514 Nodes/second : 1081805
v1.7.0
Total time (ms) : 6192 Nodes searched : 7000990 Nodes/second : 1130651