Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Thanks Lee.
The difference between the names in here:
http://biocache.ala.org.au/ws/assertions/codes
and here
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjNtzhUIIHeNdHJOYk1SYWE4dU1BMWZmb2h
iTjlYQlE&hl=en_US#gid=0
should just be formatting (camelCase vs uppercase+underscores). Feel free to
add the camel case equivalent as an additional column to the spreadsheet.
We are going to stick with the camel case for biocache web services as changing
this will be too painful for us and external users of the services e.g. the R
library Kristen's group have written (as an aside, I assume you guys have
looked at this).
The inconsistencies in downloaded assertions is something we'll look into. My
understanding was that we where limiting the downloaded assertions to those
applicable to the downloaded dataset. i.e. if one record in the dataset fails
an test, then include the column). Natasha - can you update us on how this is
working ?
Original comment by moyesyside
on 27 Apr 2014 at 11:21
Some comments regarding the reference to Issue 489:
By default the downloads include all the assertions that have at least one true
value in the result set. This is not a conflict with Issue 489. Rather 489
ensures that the assertions are reported in a consistent order
(alphabetically).
Issue 489 goes further by enhancing the downloads so that a user can turn off
the assertions by providing a param qa=none.
It also allows a user to supply a list of assertions that they are interested
in. All assertions supplied will be included in the download irrespective of
the value. Example:
qa=decimalLatLongConverted,invalidCollectionDate,speciesOutsideExpertRange,state
CoordinateMismatch,invalidScientificName
The biocache-service changes for Issue 489 are in production.
We still need to modify the biocache hubs so that the download dialog allows a
user to select a list of assertions to include in there downloads.
Original comment by natasha....@csiro.au
on 27 Apr 2014 at 11:22
Attached from Jeremy Van Der Wal regards differences between ws and download
Original comment by leebel...@gmail.com
on 9 Jun 2014 at 7:40
Attachments:
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
leebel...@gmail.com
on 27 Apr 2014 at 10:59Attachments: