Original Issue reported by Project Member Reported by leebel...@gmail.com, Mar
21, 2011 - https://code.google.com/p/alageospatialportal/issues/detail?id=442
Project Member Reported by leebel...@gmail.com, Mar 21, 2011
The 1km data is fine for all but the hilly parts of Oz. Given the inevitable
GER and associated regional projects, we need to move to the tried and true
250m grid.
Kristen will need to provide these layers in collaboration with others such as
Jane Elith, Mike Hutchinson and Janet Stein.
The 250m grid would need to align with the 1km grid. It would not replace it.
Post UI re-design and pre GER grumbles.
May 24, 2011 Project Member #1 leebel...@gmail.com
To High
Initial Dynamic Vegetation Cover as trial. Main issue: Need to consider how we
handle the 250m layers (of which we will eventually have around 50 frgom
Kristen).
Can we use WMS or WCS to support dynamic generation of a selected polygon (area
option)
Store Classes as separate WMS or WCS for Gaz?
Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-High May 24, 2011 Project Member #2 leebel...@gmail.com
Started
Status: Started Jun 30, 2011 #3 gavin.ja...@gmail.com
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Owner: gavin.ja...@gmail.com Jun 30, 2011 Project Member #4 leebel...@gmail.com
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Cc: -gavin.ja...@gmail.com leebel...@gmail.com Jul 10, 2011 Project Member #5 leebel...@gmail.com
Set medium until Kristen delivers. Emailing her today.
Labels: -Priority-High Priority-Medium Aug 10, 2011 Project Member #6 leebel...@gmail.com
I'm inclined to finish off dynamic vegetation cover and raise a new issue once
we get the 250m climate layers from Kristen. Upping this now to critical to
enable remaining points to be addressed and issue closed (we need to get this
layer public asap).
Remaining:
1. Support for hover tool
2. I know that there are multiple time periods. Did we get any? If so, we need
to decide what to use. I'd like to see at least 3 different time slices.
Nov 22, 2011 #7 gavin.ja...@gmail.com
Reassigning to Chris - this will become a higher priority once the 250m res
layers are received.
Note that the dynamic landcover layer (918, dlcmv1) still requires updated
metadata on dev before being released to prod, discuss this with Lee upon your
return - he has a contact named Leo who may be able to assist.
Owner: chris.fl...@gmail.com Apr 25, 2012 Project Member #8 leebel...@gmail.com
Lowering. On demand layers.
Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-Low Apr 25, 2012 Project Member #9 leebel...@gmail.com
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Labels: -Priority-Low Priority-Critical May 13, 2012 Project Member #10 chris.fl...@gmail.com
Lee - this was set to low and the back up to critical - which is it? If it's
critical can you give me some further details about it? Thanks.
May 13, 2012 Project Member #11 leebel...@gmail.com
We are dependent on Kristen supplying these layers and given her workload on
the NPEI and other work, I'm not sure it will happen by June 30. Set to Low and
triggered review on receipt of layers. Kristen addd to issue. Adam removed.
Cc: -adam_col...@tpg.com.au Kristen....@csiro.au Labels: -Priority-Critical Priority-Low Jul 11, 2013 Project Member #12 leebel...@gmail.com
This is an ideal issue for the 'environmental layer committee'. Do we replace
the 1km layers? My feeling would be yes.
Cc: moyesyside
Original issue reported on code.google.com by moyesyside on 8 Aug 2013 at 11:20
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
moyesyside
on 8 Aug 2013 at 11:20