Closed yuriever closed 1 year ago
Hi @yuriever, thanks for opening this issue. Sorry it took me so long to reply. I'm currently on hiatus from developing this package, since I'm too busy teaching. However, I plan to release a new version with many bug fixes and new features in the summer.
I have considered replacing the strings with symbol names, but I'm not sure this is a good idea, since it will make it easier to break encapsulation. However, I do plan on adding autocomplete for the object names. It won't be in the way that you suggest, since that is an undocumented and possibly broken feature, but I might use AddCodeCompletion
or something similar.
Closing this issue since this is already planned to be implemented in the next release.
Hi! I'm new using your package and have only read part of the code. I just wonder is it okay to support
Symbol
keys like replacingby
Will this replacement of patterns break codes in other place?
Or if supporting
Symbol
keys is hard, canString
keys be auto-completed byin this answer. Where are the right places to add this function?