Open frobnitzem opened 1 year ago
I got a fix for this in the parallelOfflineCommitMining branch. There was a problem where using remote callback while cloning the repo with pygit2 would cause pygit2 to become confused about what the proper name is for the main branch. I'll close this issue once that gets merged in.
Were you able to merge my async patch to add parallelism?
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023, 2:07 PM Reed Milewicz @.***> wrote:
I got a fix for this in the parallelOfflineCommitMining branch. There was a problem where using remote callback while cloning the repo with pygit2 would cause pygit2 to become confused about what the proper name is for the branch. I'll close this issue once that gets merged in.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/bssw-psip/reposcanner/issues/38#issuecomment-1866802654, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AARDW54L4VVYTI37G2O324LYKSCGZAVCNFSM6AAAAAA5WF35ZCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQNRWHAYDENRVGQ . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
The CommitInfoMiningRoutine failed on LLNL/RAJA - potentially missing development branches or something.
Reproducer:
Output: