We got a comment at the ISS tutorial suggesting that we were biased towards HPC and modeling and simulation and that we could be more inclusive of software for experimental and observational science too.
I consider this to be a completely reasonable and justified comment. We should think about how we can be more inclusive in the regard. Of course the big challenge is that the tutorial team's experience is pretty much exclusively in HPC mod sim. Maybe we need to diversify the team? I think that would be hard for IDEAS to do per se, but might be part of engaging with INTERSECT and Code Refinery and such. And/or it could be something for the post-ECP software sustainability orgs -- especially if they're able to expand to include the expt/obs facility folks.
We got a comment at the ISS tutorial suggesting that we were biased towards HPC and modeling and simulation and that we could be more inclusive of software for experimental and observational science too.
I consider this to be a completely reasonable and justified comment. We should think about how we can be more inclusive in the regard. Of course the big challenge is that the tutorial team's experience is pretty much exclusively in HPC mod sim. Maybe we need to diversify the team? I think that would be hard for IDEAS to do per se, but might be part of engaging with INTERSECT and Code Refinery and such. And/or it could be something for the post-ECP software sustainability orgs -- especially if they're able to expand to include the expt/obs facility folks.