Closed sigiesec closed 5 years ago
When using "API" instead of "ServiceAPI", it is no longer clear from the namespace that the contained structs are non-opaque "data transfer objects". In that case, this information should be added to the names of the classes as a suffix, or a subnamepace "DTO" might be used. But maybe it would be better just to stick with "ServiceAPI".
Meanwhile I am of similar opinion. In respect of the usage, the name ServiceAPI makes sense. ... So, I think there is no need to have a way to configure the namespace to "API".
Thanks for your response. I am closing the issue consequently.
For example, instead of using "ServiceAPI", only "API" might be used.