Closed sigiesec closed 6 years ago
Review status: 22 of 23 files reviewed at latest revision, all discussions resolved.
com.btc.serviceidl/src/com/btc/serviceidl/generator/cpp/IModuleStructureStrategy.java, line 11 at r12 (raw file):
public interface IModuleStructureStrategy { IPath getIncludeFilePath(Iterable<ModuleDeclaration> declarations, ProjectType type, String baseName,
Some documentation (javadoc) would be nice.
com.btc.serviceidl/src/com/btc/serviceidl/generator/cpp/cab/CABModuleStructureStrategy.xtend, line 35 at r12 (raw file):
GeneratorUtil.asPath(ParameterBundle.createBuilder(module_stack).with(project_type).build, ArtifactNature.CPP)).append(if (headerType == HeaderType.PROTOBUF_HEADER) "gen" else "include").append( baseName).addFileExtension(if (headerType == HeaderType.PROTOBUF_HEADER) "pb.h" else "h")
Such "mega" chains are error-prone and should be split-up. Additionally, it is hard to find out what is actually done.
com.btc.serviceidl/src/com/btc/serviceidl/generator/cpp/prins/PrinsModuleStructureStrategy.xtend, line 32 at r12 (raw file):
GeneratorUtil.asPath(ParameterBundle.createBuilder(module_stack).with(project_type).build, ArtifactNature.CPP)).append(if (headerType == HeaderType.PROTOBUF_HEADER) "gen" else "include").append( baseName).addFileExtension(if (headerType == HeaderType.PROTOBUF_HEADER) "pb.h" else "h")
Such "mega" chains are error-prone and should be split-up. Additionally, it is hard to find out what is actually done.
Comments from Reviewable
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 3 unresolved discussions.
Comments from Reviewable
Review status: 19 of 27 files reviewed at latest revision, 3 unresolved discussions.
com.btc.serviceidl/src/com/btc/serviceidl/generator/cpp/IModuleStructureStrategy.java, line 11 at r12 (raw file):
Some documentation (javadoc) would be nice.
Done.
com.btc.serviceidl/src/com/btc/serviceidl/generator/cpp/cab/CABModuleStructureStrategy.xtend, line 35 at r12 (raw file):
Such "mega" chains are error-prone and should be split-up. Additionally, it is hard to find out what is actually done.
The formatting is unfortunate, but the Xtend formatter cannot be configured to format this in a "stacked" form, unfortunately. The Java code formatter supports this ("Qualified invocations").
A workaround would be to insert trailing line comments, but I do not think this is worthwhile, the indentation is also not really good:
new Path(ReferenceResolver.MODULES_HEADER_PATH_PREFIX). //
append(GeneratorUtil.asPath(ParameterBundle.createBuilder(module_stack).with(project_type).build,
ArtifactNature.CPP)). //
append(headerType.includeDirectoryName). //
append(baseName). //
addFileExtension(headerType.fileExtension)
But I extracted the conditional expressions into functions, which improves readability.
Done.
com.btc.serviceidl/src/com/btc/serviceidl/generator/cpp/prins/PrinsModuleStructureStrategy.xtend, line 32 at r12 (raw file):
Such "mega" chains are error-prone and should be split-up. Additionally, it is hard to find out what is actually done.
Done.
Comments from Reviewable
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, all discussions resolved.
Comments from Reviewable
This change is